The Type of Politics Played by Women Members of UK Free Sample

Question: Critical Anayse of the Article Gender and Party. Answer: Introduction The article Gender and party is an excellent write up regarding women members of House of Commons in United Kingdom parliament. The article is very informative on matters of women and the type of politics they play. The article talks about various intrigues that inform day to day operation at the floor of the house as well as how women members collaborate with each other in either cross party or same party regarding common issues of feminism. Summary of the article This article is about gander and parties more specifically it touches on the type of politics played by women members of UKs House of Commons. It seeks to explain whether the type of politics played by these women parliamentarians is a result of gender i.e. feminism or they have been influenced by their respective parties. Another main idea of the article is the political relationships of the women in the house. It seek to lay bare what sort of relation do women MPs have with each other outside party affiliations? Can they come together on issues affecting women and have one stand on it as women parliamentarians regardless of party positions? Like signing early day motion (EDM) to push their agenda at the floor of the house? (Cameron and Shaw, n.d.) The article notes that many of the new Labour party MPs think that women MPs in the house practice different kind of politics from men although others feel that kind of politics one practices is determined by gender and party. Majority of the Labour and Liberal party women MPs feel that being a woman member of conservative party is unfortunate. The women members of Conservative party have had to drop their feminism agenda for men agenda in order to survive in the party. The party is known to over defending men positions even when it is clear that it is oppressive to women. A case in point is when Labour women parliamentarians were agitating for a case a bout Mike Tyson fighting in Scotland there were two Conservative women MPs who were showing some signs of collaborating with the Labour women on Tysons case but eventually the Conservative MPs never signed the early day motion (EDM) to push for the case in the house. (Dionne, 2010) The article also points out that women MPs do not practice different kind of politics as men simply because of biological difference between them but rather because of masculine and feminist gender roles that has information the business of the house for many years until they have become solid norms and behaviors. It also elaborates that there is a new group of new men parliamentarians that tend to exhibit both women and men political practices and were equally shocked to learn about the gender role norms and behaviors they found in the house when they were elected or nominated. One woman MP attributed this to generational change as the old guard pave way for the new and younger members of the house. Analysis of the article The article has adequately addressed the issue of whether the kind of politics practiced by women parliamentarians in the House of Commons is determined by feminism or the political party affiliations. It seeks to understand this phenomenon by asking the opinion of the women MPs in the house. It finds out that based on the perception and experience many new labour women MPs are of the opinion that women practice different kind of politics. This aspect is significant because it shades light on what effect does perception of the house and its experience have on the kind of politics women MPs practices. (Women in the workplace, n.d.) The paper addresses the issue of party identity and how it affects women MPs. Of interest here is the Conservative party women MPs who have had to fully buy in to the idea of men agenda in order to remain relevant politically within the party ranks. The women are afraid to raise their voices and stand for feminism and women rights. This information shows how some political parties have entrenched their values since inception although they could have been formed in a different century. It also highlights the political space available within the parties for divergent opinions. While others are more liberal and tolerant like Labour party which as per the article we see its women speaking freely expressing their mind others dont show a lot of enthusiasm when it comes to letting their women express themselves freely. (Gottlieb and Toye, 2013) As a result of masculinity and feminism in the house the roles have been categorized along these lines. The article points out that some women MPs have come out to speak against these kinds of norms and behaviors in the House of Commons. As a result other younger members of the house have also come out to voice their concerns over the same. By highlighting this the article is pointing out the leadership roles that the women are having in the house, breaking traditional barriers and encouraging other like-minded members of the house both men and women to also speak their mind and not to fear speaking against norms they find inappropriate even when they are a century old. The question of cross party relations between members of the house is also highlighted by the article. The research points out that woman MPs have a tendency to try and forge a united front than their male counterparts. It shows that women members in the house are likely to be the change agents while men sticking with maintenance of the status quo. Thus it shows that if the House of Commons was to have more women than men a lot more political practices will change towards more collaborations and seeking of understanding of each other enhancing harmony in the house a recipe for better deliberation devoid of political standings. The article should have however contained the views of women members of conservative party on the reason why they tend to support men agenda as opposed to feminine agenda? Is it because they fully support these agendas or they can not speak their mind freely as the party is largely controlled by men with some strong standing on matters men agenda? This sort of answers would have lifted the lid on why these women MPs in Conservative party tend to be fully aligned to the party. (Griffin, 2012) The article is nonetheless focused on the topic backing conclusions drawn with some research by way of interview and finding out the opinions of the members of the House of Commons. Conclusion The article has extensively covered women MPs in the United Kingdom in important fronts such as collaborations they have fostered barriers they have to break for more equality, leadership qualities they have demonstrated as well as their view on kind of politics they practice in relation to gender and party. References Cameron, D. and Shaw, S. (n.d.). Gender, power and political speech. Dionne, A. (2010). Women, men and the representation of women in the British parliaments. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Gottlieb, J. and Toye, R. (2013). The Aftermath of Suffrage. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Griffin, B. (2012). The politics of gender in Victorian Britain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hosur, P. (2010). Review Essay. Strategic Analysis, 34(6), pp.925-928. Women in the workplace. (n.d.). .